Fire at Notre Dame

During the holiest week on the Christian calendar, one of the most famous and beautiful churches in the world was badly damaged by an accidental fire. Over the years, many church buildings and houses of worship have been damaged and destroyed by fire: sometimes accidental fire, sometimes fire caused by lightning, sometimes arson, and sometimes acts of war. But yesterday’s fire at Notre Dame of Paris will be remembered more than most church fires because of the history of the building, because of its status as a landmark in Paris, and because of its beauty. Citizens of Paris and of France mourn the loss, as do many people around the world. Roman Catholics and other Christians mourn the loss, but so do many people who are not Christians. Already large amounts of money are being promised to rebuild what was lost and to restore what was damaged.

A few people might say that the money would be better spent meeting the needs of the poor or spreading the news of the gospel to all nations. That feeling has always existed within the Church. When a woman anointed Jesus with perfume, his disciples grumbled about the waste, but Jesus responded, “She has done what she could; she has anointed my body beforehand for burial. And truly, I say to you, wherever the gospel is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will be told in memory of her” (Mark 13:8-9). Jesus accepts the artwork created to honor him as he accepts all sincere worship from his people. The glory of God and the gift of salvation through Christ is proclaimed by cathedrals with statues and stained glass windows as well as by humble preachers in humble surroundings.

But what of the commandment to make no graven images? What of the sin of the golden calf? Idols are works of religious art, but they have a purpose: they are meant to capture the divine and to make the divine serve human purposes. God does not oppose all religious artwork: the same God who banned graven images and despised the golden calf also told Moses how to make the ark of the covenant, including the mercy seat with its two cherubim. The sin is not in the work of art; the sin is in the intent of the people, whether they wish to honor God, or whether they wish to honor themselves and establish control over God.

God designed a tabernacle to travel with the Israelites in the wilderness so his dwelling would be in their midst. King Solomon built a temple in Jerusalem based on the pattern of the tabernacle so God would dwell in the midst of his people, even though the entire universe cannot contain the Lord. Imagine the heartache and despair of God’s people when Solomon’s temple was destroyed at the end of a long siege by the Babylonians in 586 BC. But God worked in history so his people could return to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple. The second temple was destroyed by Roman forces in 70 AD. Jesus prophesied that the temple would be leveled, with no two stones atop one another, and this was fulfilled when Roman soldiers pried apart the stones of the ruined temple to gather the gold that had melted and flowed between the stones.

Forty years before the destruction of the second temple, Jesus entered that temple and drove out the moneychangers and the merchants of sacrificial animals. When temple authorities asked Jesus who gave him the right to do these things, he responded, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it again” (John 2:19). “But the temple he had spoken of was his body” (John 2:21). For the Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us (John 1:14), just as he made his dwelling in the tabernacle and in the temple. The human body of Jesus is the ultimate temple, the dwelling of the Lord, the one point of access that people have to the true God.

What happened to that body, that temple? It was arrested, accused, convicted, and sentenced to death. It was slapped, beaten, spit upon, and handed over to the Romans. It was scourged, mocked, tortured, and killed. It was nailed to a Roman cross outside of Jerusalem and left to die in the darkness of Good Friday. Yet, as Jesus promised, on the third day it was raised, restored, healed, and made alive, never to die again.

The fire at Notre Dame reminds Christians of the suffering of Jesus on Good Friday. I hope and I expect that Christians will gather in or near the ruined cathedral this Good Friday and will hear again the scriptures that describe the destruction of the true Temple, the body of Christ the Lord. I hope and I expect that the same Christians will return to the cathedral Easter morning and will hear and celebrate the scriptures that describe the resurrection of the true Temple. Wherever Christians gather this Friday and this Sunday, they will speak, not of a beautiful building damaged by fire, but of a beautiful Savior crucified and risen. May the fire at Notre Dame be a witness to the world of the Passion of our Lord and of his victory over all evil. J.

16 thoughts on “Fire at Notre Dame

  1. I’m not against religious art per se; but do you feel Notre Dame did not have any idols at all? I’m not saying I’m pro-fire and burning but it seems we can go the other extreme of not acknowledging the idolatrous dimension of Notre Dame?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jim, I think this is a matter for Christian freedom. Paul addresses the topic writing to the Romans and the Corinthians about whether Christians can eat meat that was sacrificed to idols. Paul says that if the Christian can receive the meat with thanksgiving to God and an untroubled conscience, the Christian may eat the meat. If the Christian is troubled in conscience, the Christian should not eat. If two Christians are together and one is troubled in conscience and does not eat, the other should also not eat out of love for a fellow Christian. Did some of the many visitors to Notre Dame approach the artwork in a spirit of idolatry? Undoubtedly. Should all Christians therefore condemn the cathedral and the artwork it contains? Absolutely not. We are to exhort one another to good works and warn one another against sinful behavior, but in matters of Christian freedom we are not to judge each other.
      Many church buildings are named for Biblical figures. If we were to refuse to enter any building named for Saint Peter or Saint Paul or Saint John, we would miss being with a lot of fellow believers in Christ. And the same goes for a building named for the mother of our Lord. J.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I’m not against Christian art work per se but it does seem some of the statues and relics are tied
        To a theology of merit embedded in a soteriology Of works righteousness. Also I’m not against historical value of building and things if I can add for clarification purposes

        Liked by 1 person

      • If meat that has been offered to a false god in a pagan temple is acceptable for Christians to eat, then even artwork that is used by false teachers who proclaim works righteousness can still hold value for Christians who know that they are saved by grace through faith alone. Such works may even provide opportunities to discuss the nature of salvation and bring people out of the darkness and into the light. J.


  2. Lovely post, Salvageable.

    Religious art (or architecture) really brings me closer to the Lord. You can sense the Muse behind it, “Who” the artists are trying to speak of and to describe, and the incredible workmanship and effort that went into it. Words just don’t do Him justice, sometimes you just need a Sistine chapel or a great cathedral.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Absolutely, IB. When some of the reformers wanted to smash the artwork in Wittenberg, Martin Luther risked his life by coming out of hiding to rebuke the iconoclasts. Granted, he was bored with hiding and would have taken another excuse, but he took a stand on protecting the works of art that were teaching people many things about the Lord and his work. J.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I have visited the Notre Dame once, years ago. Seeing it burn really affected me somehow. The way you used this catastrophe in your story is beautiful and I hope your words bring solace to many.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Great point, the temple that matters is Christ’s body! Love this connection to the recent burning of Notre Dame.

    Interesting side conversation about the potential of art glorying God. God did instruct Moses to make the bronze serpent as well…so art can glorify Christ. I’m not convinced that Churches should use resources to build grand buildings, but it’s not forbidden either.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’ve never been there–I’ve only seen the pictures. It will be interesting to see how they rebuild. Will they try to make it as it was, or will they add some twenty-first century art? J.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s